Author Topic: the royals  (Read 61 times)

Q13.1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6535
  • RAF Upper Heyford
    • Me
the royals
« on: September 04, 2017, 02:38:25 PM »
news of another one on  its way. am  i correct in believing the cambridges won't get any benefits for this their third?

Alizarin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16764
  • Building a country that works or everyon
Re: the royals
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2017, 05:14:55 PM »
Ahh bless! Another cutesy ikkle benefits scrounger on the way for them to dress how kids were dressed in the 1950s.  Will it be a girl scrounger or a boy scrounger?  What kind of old fashioned name will it have? 

If it's a boy and in the spirit of getting our country back, why not go pre-Norman Conquest and call it Aethelbald as it's bound to be bald by 30.

If it's a girl call it Harriet Highclass Good Time Girl Windsor, after Diana with a nod to jolly hockey-sticks Kate.  :ROFL:
« Last Edit: September 04, 2017, 05:17:01 PM by Alizarin »

Sir Rocis de Liver

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 11017
Re: the royals
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2017, 05:53:54 PM »
.......and the Daily Mail has the gall to rail against feckless Benefit scroungers and social- housing grabbing single mums for breeding like crazy at hard-working taxpayers' expense.